Environmental impact of the oil and gas industry's consumption of water from the Athabasca River during the predicted water shortage for Canada's western prairie provinces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water consumption in Alberta continues to grow as demand from industry, agriculture and municipalities increases.In future years, these sectors will be unable to consume the water needed to meet demand because of the projected decreases in water availability.Climate change is predicted to cause decreases in snow pack accumulation and result in continued retreat of glaciers, both of which will reduce the overall water quantity available downstream.The oil and gas industry uses large amounts of water in their processes and facilities, some of which cannot be directly returned to the water cycle.This water is tied up in tailings ponds and Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) oil reservoirs, but most consumed water is returned to the water cycle through evaporation.This large consumption of water is concerning citizens in Alberta.To address the potential water shortage and the concerns about the oil and gas industry's use of water in the Athabasca Oil Sands, the Alberta Government, industry and other non-governmental organizations have developed various strategies, reports, legislation, allocation guidelines and recommendations for the future.This report provides information on the Athabasca River Basin and the Peace-Athabasca Delta, water legislation and allocation in Alberta, water consumption by the oil and gas industry, and potential environmental impacts of the oil and gas industry's consumption of water.It presents results of a secondary data analysis, which indicate current and future oil and gas projects, given an increase in water consumption and a decrease in the Athabasca River's natural flow, will consume 1.86% of the Athabasca River's natural flow.This report concludes by discussing the information obtained through the literature review and results of the secondary data and analysis and by providing recommendations that would improve the sustainable use of water by the oil and gas industry, effectively balancing the environmental and economic needs of Alberta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".