Especialidades Tradicionales Garantizadas Made in Perú y la Propiedad Industrial como aliado en la reactivación del sector gastronómico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In November 2021, DS 170-2021-PCM was enacted in Peru, approving the Regulations of the Protection Regime for Traditional Specialties Guaranteed and the Geographical Indications Regime. By May 2023, the Directorate of Distinctive Signs (DDS) of Indecopi granted the registration of the first Traditional Specialty Guaranteed (TSG) in Peru, and the second in Latin America: El Pan de Anís de Concepción. During the first quarter of 2024, the Traditional Specialty Guaranteed seal was published on the Peruvian State’s single digital platform. As can be seen, TSGs are a new legal figure in Peruvian Industrial Property legislation. The purpose of this article is to present, in an educational way, the relevant information that allows to know, with the necessary detail, the most notable aspects of the applicable legal framework. It also highlights the great potential they must contribute to strengthening the national gastronomic market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".