Emigração e saúde: um estudo de portuguesas reformadas em Ottawa-Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, an attempt is made to describe and discuss the personal experiences, as well as the health perceptions and practices of Canadian-Portuguese elderly women living in the Ottawa region. The resultsindicate that, without exception, all these women had a rather difficult life trajectory however, after retirement, they recognize a positive increase in life satisfaction. Their perceptions of a healthy life style include diverse dimensions: it is physical, mental and spiritual. Finally, they also refer that a balanced nutrition, medical consultation, and physical/social activities are important health practices. Neste artigo, descreve-se e discute-se as experiências, percepções e práticas de saúde de mulheres idosas de origem luso-canadiana e estabelecidas na região de Ottawa. Os resultados obtidos indicam que, sem excepção, todas as entrevistadas tiveram um percurso de vida dificil. No entanto, chegadas à reforma, declaram-se mais satisfeitas com a vida. As suas percepções de um estilo de vida saudável incluem as dimensões físicas, mentais e espirituais. Por fim, referem igualmente que um regime alimentar equilibrado, as consultas ao médico e as actividades físicas e sociais constituem práticas de saúde fundamentais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".