En quête d'une tradition : l'inscription du passé dans l'oeuvre de Pierre Vadeboncoeur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a review of the complete works of Pierre Vadeboncoeur (1920-2010), which yield insight into marks of the past. While we disagree with the idea that the essayist was simply driven from the Moderns to the Ancients in the 1970's, we want to delve deeper into past relationships and complex networks in order to systematically provide an educated response. Indeed, Vadeboncoeur's writings show these relationships were in existence as early as the 1940's. We refuse to consider the return of the past like an exit of the Modernity: in fact, in the 1950's, it was necessary to a modern shift. The past has always been firmly entrenched in the present and future. The marks of the past in the writings of the essayist strongly amplify the culture and the persona, allotting time and space necessary for their full development. The relationship between past, present and future is at the core of the dialectical relationship (between tradition and modernization, between the stability and the movement, between peasants and explorers) that the ambivalent essayist tries to resolve in the 1970's. From that time on, he is fully conscious of those relationships and often goes back in different pasts: he is discovering the greatness of the Middle Ages, but also the ÂGreat Darkness of French Canada; he is also exploring childhood and art themes in his works; he is finally looking for his own past, until the 1930's, from Jacques Maritain to Lionel Groulx and François Hertel. This thesis is divided into four (4) chapters: the first chapter includes the past accounts of French Canadian artists and intellectuals in the early 1960's. The second includes a look at the marks of the universal past in the works of Pierre Vadeboncoeur. The third covers the marks of the French canadian past in the same publications. Finally the fourth chapter delves into the presence of the art and childhood themes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".