MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028338259

Estudio paramétrico del diseño de las conexiones precalificadas a momento viga-columna en edificaciones de acero: una revisión del estado del arte.

2022· other· es· W7028338259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAaltodoc (Aalto University) · 2022
Typeother
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Mexico cityQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al revisarse el tema de las conexiones precalificadas para estructuras metálicas o en acero, se encuentra que hay diversos autores que han explicado los tipos de conexiones que existen, y que cumplen parámetros incluidos en las normas tanto a nivel mundial como regional; esto, acompañado de ensayos experimentales, lleva a obtener una conexión viable para su uso en la práctica. Se muestra una recopilación de cada documento revisado, mostrando los parámetros encontrados por los autores, quienes han usado y comparado diversas combinaciones en los componentes de las conexiones a momento y dando sus conclusiones y recomendaciones propias, pero estas no se transcriben en este trabajo, antes bien, se plasma las ideas y conclusiones propias del autor de este trabajo de grado, luego de estudiar y comparar todos los resultados investigados en la literatura. Se resalta el estudio de las conexiones a momento de estructuras metálicas como: End Plate (placa extrema), Double T (doble T), Plata Banda y Vigas RBS (vigas de sección reducida), mostrándose los parámetros principales de cada una de ellas, así como el análisis de las variantes que pueden presentarse en la configuración y la modificación en los resultados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAaltodoc (Aalto University)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207