Engelli Bireylerde Mesleki Rehabilitasyonun Çalışma Performansına Etkisi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was planned to evaluate the effect of the occupational therapy program designed to enhance the problems of people with disabilities in their occupational identity, occupational competence, and occupational performance. 20 People who have applied to Hacettepe University Vocational Rehabilitation Center were included in the study. A configured interview method was practiced to the individuals by using the form of medical record, Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM), the Occpational Performance History Interview about the occupational performance (OPHI-II). Individual work performance was observed and assessed with a structured activity. Practice based occupational therapy (OT) had been practiced 120 minutes per session for once a week over 7 weeks as group intervention. After the group intervention, people with disabilities were evaluated again with same assesments and the results were compared. Within 3 months of group intervention, individual intervention was applied to the people who entered a job and the evaluations were repeated at the workplace. As a result of our study, there was a statistically significant difference between before and after intervention in COPM, OPHI-II, the measures of work performance (p<0.01). 15 people could be reached within the following 3 months and it was determined that 8 of them were entered a job. The individuals who entered the job were asked about areas they experienced problems. After the intervention (consultancy, activity adaptation, ergonomic arrangement, driver rehabilitation, etc.) in these problems, it was seen that the problems they stated in the COPM are intended for the areas they want to develop. Statistical significant was found in the results of OPHI-II (p<0.01) and it was not seen any problems about work performance. Vocational rehabilitation based on OT in people with disabilities provides an improvement in areas of work performance, occupational identity and occupational competence of individuals. There is a need for interventions include workplace intervention and analyze the effect of vocational rehabilitation based on OT in other areas such as quaility of life, daily living, motivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".