Effet de soulèvement des fondations sur le comportement sismique des murs de refends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interaction sol structure et les codes de conception -- Études antérieures sur le soulèvement de fondations superficielles -- Évolutions des spécifications sismiques au Canada dans le CNB -- Comportement dynamique des murs en blocs rigides -- Bloc rigide avec fondation rigide -- Bloc rigide avec fondation élastique -- Murs de refend modélisés par des structures flexibles -- Fondation élastique à deux ressorts-amortisseurs -- Modèle de fondation Winkler -- Réponse sismique des murs avec Ruaumoko -- Amortissement de Rayleigh -- Comparaison des réponses de Ruaumoko et de Matlab -- Comparaison entre le modèle à deux ressorts et le modèle Winkler dans Ruaumoko -- Dimensionnement des murs de refend -- Dimensionnement des semelles de fondations -- Propriétés dynamiques de sol de fondation -- Sélection des séismes pour l'Est et l'Ouest du Canada -- Étude paramétrique et effets sur la réponse sismique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".