MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028405950

Fake news, opioids, hospital harm is the 3rd leading cause of death in Canada and the U.S., and the impact of Wynne government's health care cuts

2017· other· en· W7028405950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmLimitingGovernment (linguistics)Health careSupreme courtChronic painPain medicinePublic health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Media have and are reporting fake news stories about the Trump administration. Guest: Daniel Payne, who details the stories in The Federalist - Governments in Canada and the U.S. about to pass regulations limiting the amount of opioids which can be prescribed. Guest: Professor David Juurlink, head of the division of clinical pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Toronto and key advisor on opioid policy to governments Guest: Dr. Fiona Campbell, president-elect of the Canadian Pain Society. Anesthesiologist in the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine at Sick Kids hospital and an associate professor at the University of Toronto - Caller Michael tells Roy about his experience living with chronic pain and how opioids are the only way life is bearable. - Hospital harm is the third leading cause of death in Canada and the United States. Guest: Kathleen Finlay, CEO and founder of the Center for Patient Protection - How have Wynne government health care cuts hurt patients and physicians? Guest: Dr. David Jacobs, Director of Coalition of Ontario DoctorsLearn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207