MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028411328

Environmentální otázky v současném kanadském románu

2025· other· en· W7028411328 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionDystopiaEcocriticismAnthropocentrismBachelor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This bachelor thesis deals predominantly with the concepts of anthropocentrism and ecofeminism, alongside the connected concepts of ecocriticism and androcentrism in the contemporary Canadian selected novels - Margaret Atwood's MaddAddam trilogy, which consists of Oryx and Crake, The Year of the Flood and MaddAddam and Nina Munteanu's A Diary in the Age of Water. With support from academic sources, the thesis consists of a theoretical background introducing the concepts used for the analysis of the novels. Namely, the concepts are used to compare the contrasts and similarities in the depiction of the dystopian future envisioned by Atwood and Munteanu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice)Same topicFamily and Matrimonial LawFrench-language works237,207