MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028411328

Environmentální otázky v současném kanadském románu

2025· other· en· W7028411328 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionDystopiaEcocriticismAnthropocentrismBachelor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This bachelor thesis deals predominantly with the concepts of anthropocentrism and ecofeminism, alongside the connected concepts of ecocriticism and androcentrism in the contemporary Canadian selected novels - Margaret Atwood's MaddAddam trilogy, which consists of Oryx and Crake, The Year of the Flood and MaddAddam and Nina Munteanu's A Diary in the Age of Water. With support from academic sources, the thesis consists of a theoretical background introducing the concepts used for the analysis of the novels. Namely, the concepts are used to compare the contrasts and similarities in the depiction of the dystopian future envisioned by Atwood and Munteanu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it