MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028427061

Exploring Structural Variant Identification using Current Software, Whole-Genome Alignment Methods, and a Preliminary Study into Graph-based Alternatives

2023· dissertation· en· W7028427061 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenome Rearrangement Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJaccard indexIdentification (biology)Consistency (knowledge bases)Pipeline (software)Sequence (biology)Process (computing)Genome
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural variants (SVs) are genetic sequence rearrangements that play a significant role in many critical biological traits; however, current SV identification tools often produce substantial disparities in their outputs. Additionally, due to low alignment accuracy, most SV identification methods struggle in complex or repetitive genetic regions, introducing errors in the SV results. This struggle with alignment accuracy is especially concerning when considering the highly repetitive nature of plant genomes. Consequently, this thesis addresses four research objectives, including a comparative study of several state-of-the-art SV tools, the creation of a whole genome alignment-based SV calling model, the construction of a quantitative and automated evaluation process to measure the accuracy of SV results, and a preliminary study into the patterns created by simulated SV sequences when modelled using sequence graphs.\n\nFirst, this thesis proposes a Snakemake pipeline named Structural Variants - Jaccard Index Measure, or SV-JIM, to identify SVs using multiple SV callers and then reduce the disparity and improve the confidence of SV results. SV-JIM contains several existing SV callers that take raw sequencing reads or genome assemblies as input. It uses these callers as a foundation to generate SV sets supported by multiple types of evidence and results. Further, this work evaluates inter-caller consistency and examines several patterns produced by their results through an aggregation approach. SV-JIM was validated using datasets from several species, including Brassica nigra, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens, which permitted a detailed survey of its results with different-sized genomes. The human genome data allowed SV-JIM to be benchmarked against known SV locations to assess its precision, recall, and F1 scores. Using the benchmark, the SV callers contained in SV-JIM achieved precision and recall rates as high as 67% and 90%. The benchmark served to identify top performers and provided insights into finding the optimal amount of consensus between SV callers. SV-JIM is available under MIT license through GitHub at https://github.com/USask-BINFO/SV-JIM.\n\nSecond, this thesis proposes a software pipeline named Structural Variant Pattern Scan, or SVPS, to explore using whole genome alignment for SV detection. SVPS takes whole genome alignments (WGA) as input and detects SV locations based on patterns found in the input WGA. Several quantitative and automated processes to improve the thoroughness of SV result verification are incorporated within SVPS to evaluate the precision of its results when validated using Brassica nigra and Arabidopsis thaliana data. Using these data, SVPS demonstrated high precision rates above 90% for most SV types. In addition, the experiments used multiple whole genome alignment software configurations to study the effect of alignment sensitivity on SV results, suggesting that differences in sensitivity can reduce the granularity of alignment gaps and distort which regions are reported. SVPS is available under MIT license through GitHub at https://github.com/USask-BINFO/SVPS.\n\nLast, this thesis explores using k-mer and string graphs to model biological sequences and examine any patterns created by variations at known SV locations. Several basic k-mer and string graphs were constructed using simulated sequences containing a single SV to identify graph patterns that could be used to detect SV locations algorithmically. These graphs also revealed several complexities in the graphs' construction, including a string graph's tendency to represent identical subsequences using different vertices. This led to a greedy approach to their construction. Further, these experiments also identified several desirable graph features to explore in future research, including providing single base SV breakpoint resolution between vertices and allowing genetic sequences to traverse vertices in both the forward and reverse orientations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207