MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7028427061

Exploring Structural Variant Identification using Current Software, Whole-Genome Alignment Methods, and a Preliminary Study into Graph-based Alternatives

2023· dissertation· en· W7028427061 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenome Rearrangement Algorithms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésJaccard indexIdentification (biology)Consistency (knowledge bases)Pipeline (software)Sequence (biology)Process (computing)Genome
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Structural variants (SVs) are genetic sequence rearrangements that play a significant role in many critical biological traits; however, current SV identification tools often produce substantial disparities in their outputs. Additionally, due to low alignment accuracy, most SV identification methods struggle in complex or repetitive genetic regions, introducing errors in the SV results. This struggle with alignment accuracy is especially concerning when considering the highly repetitive nature of plant genomes. Consequently, this thesis addresses four research objectives, including a comparative study of several state-of-the-art SV tools, the creation of a whole genome alignment-based SV calling model, the construction of a quantitative and automated evaluation process to measure the accuracy of SV results, and a preliminary study into the patterns created by simulated SV sequences when modelled using sequence graphs.\n\nFirst, this thesis proposes a Snakemake pipeline named Structural Variants - Jaccard Index Measure, or SV-JIM, to identify SVs using multiple SV callers and then reduce the disparity and improve the confidence of SV results. SV-JIM contains several existing SV callers that take raw sequencing reads or genome assemblies as input. It uses these callers as a foundation to generate SV sets supported by multiple types of evidence and results. Further, this work evaluates inter-caller consistency and examines several patterns produced by their results through an aggregation approach. SV-JIM was validated using datasets from several species, including Brassica nigra, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens, which permitted a detailed survey of its results with different-sized genomes. The human genome data allowed SV-JIM to be benchmarked against known SV locations to assess its precision, recall, and F1 scores. Using the benchmark, the SV callers contained in SV-JIM achieved precision and recall rates as high as 67% and 90%. The benchmark served to identify top performers and provided insights into finding the optimal amount of consensus between SV callers. SV-JIM is available under MIT license through GitHub at https://github.com/USask-BINFO/SV-JIM.\n\nSecond, this thesis proposes a software pipeline named Structural Variant Pattern Scan, or SVPS, to explore using whole genome alignment for SV detection. SVPS takes whole genome alignments (WGA) as input and detects SV locations based on patterns found in the input WGA. Several quantitative and automated processes to improve the thoroughness of SV result verification are incorporated within SVPS to evaluate the precision of its results when validated using Brassica nigra and Arabidopsis thaliana data. Using these data, SVPS demonstrated high precision rates above 90% for most SV types. In addition, the experiments used multiple whole genome alignment software configurations to study the effect of alignment sensitivity on SV results, suggesting that differences in sensitivity can reduce the granularity of alignment gaps and distort which regions are reported. SVPS is available under MIT license through GitHub at https://github.com/USask-BINFO/SVPS.\n\nLast, this thesis explores using k-mer and string graphs to model biological sequences and examine any patterns created by variations at known SV locations. Several basic k-mer and string graphs were constructed using simulated sequences containing a single SV to identify graph patterns that could be used to detect SV locations algorithmically. These graphs also revealed several complexities in the graphs' construction, including a string graph's tendency to represent identical subsequences using different vertices. This led to a greedy approach to their construction. Further, these experiments also identified several desirable graph features to explore in future research, including providing single base SV breakpoint resolution between vertices and allowing genetic sequences to traverse vertices in both the forward and reverse orientations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsTravaux en français237 207