MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028459977

Exploring Dissociation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Impact on Emotion, Cognition, and Daily Functioning Among Military Members, Veterans, and First Responders in Canada

2024· dissertation· en· W7028459977 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health ResearchMitacsMcMaster University
KeywordsDerealizationDepersonalizationDissociation (chemistry)DissociativeHypervigilanceCognitionDissociative disordersPoison controlPosttraumatic stressInjury prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Military members, veterans, and public safety personnel in Canada experience more frequent and severe symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as compared to the general population. Up to a third of individuals with PTSD experience persistent trauma-related dissociation symptoms, including depersonalization (feeling detached from oneself) and derealization (feeling detached from the world). Dissociative presentations reflect hypoarousal (e.g., emotional numbing and blunted affect) and contrast with classic PTSD symptoms of hyperarousal (e.g., hypervigilance and physiological reactivity). Although dissociation is linked to severe trauma and PTSD, research focusing on classic PTSD symptoms has dominated the trauma literature. To address this gap in research, I explored the impact of dissociation on emotion regulation, cognition, and daily functioning among adults seeking treatment for PTSD in Canada. In Chapter 2, I characterized dissociation symptoms in a sample public safety personnel. Approximately 25% of individuals reported elevated dissociation, which was associated with greater PTSD severity, emotion dysregulation, and daily impairment. In Chapter 3, I examined whether dissociation and emotion dysregulation predict cognitive dysfunction in a sample of military members, veterans, and public safety personnel. Both dissociation and emotion dysregulation symptoms explained, in part, impairments in cognitive functioning, even after accounting for the effects of PTSD severity. In Chapter 4, I trained machine learning models to predict PTSD-related illness in a sample of military members, veterans, public safety personnel, and civilians. Machine learning models accurately predicted self-reported PTSD severity (43% of variance) and functional impairment (32% of variance) in unseen data from patients in a hold-out test set. Both dissociation and emotion dysregulation symptoms emerged as important contributors to predictions. Overall, my findings suggest that improved recognition of trauma-related dissociative symptoms and tailored integration of evidence-based therapies may help address the complex needs of individuals experiencing PTSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research→French-language works237,207→