MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028502717

Experimental evaluation of fundamental frequencies of buildings

2007· dissertation· en· W7028502717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicProbability and Statistical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationSpectral densityFourier transformDynamic testingModal testingMicrotremorFundamental frequencyAmplitudeNormal mode
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The application of dynamic testing to civil engineering structures provides a means to understanding a structure’s dynamic properties. Such testing includes Forced Vibration Test (FVT), Earthquake Response Test, Ambient Vibration Testing (AVT), and Free Response Test. AVT has become a popular dynamic testing methodology due to its practical and economical advantages. In this research, the feasibility of employing AVT to obtain reliable fundamental frequencies of buildings was studied by performing AVT inside the Burnside Hall building of McGill University. All measurements were taken by two pairs of CityShark II Microtremor Acquisition and velocimetres. Three system identification approaches, direct Fourier Transform, Power Spectrum Density, and Auto-Regressive-Moving-Average were studied and compared. It is recommended to use both the direct Fourier Transform and the Auto-Regressive-Moving-Average to extract frequency contents from AVT data. Use of the Power Spectrum Density could easily filter out important frequency content because AVT signals typically have small amplitude. The lowest translational frequency of the Burnside building was identified to be 1.4 Hz, and the lowest rotational frequency was identified to be 2.2 Hz. Translational modes were best obtained by placing sensors near the centre of rigidity, and rotational modes were best obtained by placing sensors at corners of the building. In addition, the amplitude of the modal peaks increased as the floor elevation increased. Strong wind amplified the fundamental modes, whereas mild wind excited all modes almost equally. The fundamental periods calculated from the 1995 and 2005 NBCC were larger than that obtained from the experimental AVT period. This shows that non-structural components could contribute significantly to the stiffness of a building when the excitation is small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.327
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it