Estructuración de portafolios de inversión en el mercado integrado latinoamericano (mila) para tres escenarios de riesgo (conservador, moderado y agresivo) [recurso electrónico]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Mercado Integrado Latinoamericano es un mercado regional creado por las bolsas de valores de los países de Chile, Colombia y Perú. Dicho mercado ofrece un sin número de oportunidades a los inversionistas e intermediarios para la compra de títulos de renta variable en cualquiera de las tres plazas bursátiles. El propósito de este trabajo es la conformación de un portafolio de inversión en renta variable que, bajo los estudios de Markowitz (1952), se pretenderá realizar para tres perfiles de riesgo. Se tendrán en cuenta las herramientas tradicionales para la conformación de un portafolio como lo son las fronteras eficientes, el riesgo, la varianza, la covarianza y demás herramientas matemáticas enfocadas en la realización y conformación de una cartera. Finalmente se utilizaran algunos ratios que permitirán evaluar el desempeño de los portafolios conformados
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".