Emotional reactions to experiences of injustice in the restaurant sector : an ethnography of professional trajectories in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse porte sur les sentiments d’injustice et les réactions émotionnelles des travailleuses·eurs de la restauration au Québec. L’ethnographie menée pendant plus d’un an dans un restaurant montre l’intérêt d’une analyse des expériences d’injustice, et des réactions émotionnelles à ces expériences, qui tienne compte des systèmes organisationnels concrets mis en place, des normes comportementales intégrées (ethos), de la position professionnelle ainsi que des trajectoires personnelles des travailleuses·eurs. L’approche longitudinale entreprise dans cette recherche nous apprend l’instabilité des perceptions ; ce qui est dit à un certain moment peut être contredit à un autre moment par la·le même employé·e parce que le contexte a changé ou en raison de sa loyauté envers l’organisation. Tous ces constats appellent à une diversification des méthodes dans le domaine de la justice organisationnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".