MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028537015

Evidencia de pobre diversidad genética del manjuarí (Atractosteus tristoechus)

2023· article· es· W7028537015 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPopulation structureSexual difference
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El manjuarí (Atractosteus tristoechus) es un pez de agua dulce endémico de Cuba. Entre los Lepisosteiformes, esta especie es una de las más amenazadas y ocupa la menor área de distribución natural. Está restringida al área suroeste del archipiélago cubano. Esta investigación se enfoca en la caracterización genética de las poblaciones cautivas y naturales de la Ciénaga de Zapata, mediante dos secuencias mitocondriales (gen que codifica citocromo c oxidasa I y la Región de Control) y nueve loci microsatélite. Un total de 47 individuos fueron incluidos en la investigación. Se detectó baja variabilidad genética: h = 0.202 ± 0.077 y π = 0.00021 ± 0.00008 para las secuencias mitocondriales; Ho=0.016 y He =0.025 para los microsatélites. Entre los lepisosteidos estudiados hasta el momento, esta especie muestra la menor variabilidad genética. Estos resultados sugieren que A. tristoechus ha mantenido un pequeño tamaño efectivo poblacional durante largo tiempo y/o la población ha experimentado un cuello de botella reciente. Dada la reciente tendencia demográfica de la especie, y la baja diversidad genética mostrada en este estudio, se hace necesaria con urgencia unaatención especial, así como esfuerzos para su conservación.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→