MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028561723

Estudio arqueozoológico de la fauna del Yacimiento de Cubío Redondo (Matienzo, Cantabria)

2001· article· es· W7028561723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Statistical analysisNova scotiaPeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se estudia la serie ósea de macromamíferos del yacimento del Cubío Redondo, pequeña cavidad situada en el vlle de Matienzo (Cantabria). Se trata de una serie reducida y muy fracturada por lo que sus medidas son escasas y poco indicativas. Aparecen cinco especies de ungulados-ciervo, corzo, cabra montés, rebeco y jabalí-y dos de carnívoros-gato montés y garduña-, dominando ampliamente los primeros. El cuadro de fecuencias encaja bien en el marco paleoecológico en que se desarrollan las ocupaciones mesolíticas de la Cornisa Cantábrica, destacando la importancia de especies de apetencia forestal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0170.012
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207