MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028572131

Fluorescence based passive samplers for diluted bitumen in water

2017· dissertation· en· W7028572131 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodDiafiltrationTSG101ProteogenomicsLiquationHyporeflexia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive samplers are low-cost and simple devices that can be used to monitor analytes in dynamic systems. In this project, Polydimethylsiloxane and UltraEverDry films were tested for \napplication as passive samplers for dilbit. Three types of oil were used, dissolved, mechanically dispersed, and mechanically dispersed with chemical enhancement. PDMS absorbed oil, with dispersed oil allowing for faster uptake into PDMS than dissolved oil. Equilibration times ranged from 4-8 days for dispersed oil, depending on the thickness of the film. The lower detection limit of the thick PDMS films is approximately 0.4 ppm but can be improved by improving film reproducibility. Thin films had a partition coefficient of approximately 1000 while thick films had a partition coefficient of apprxoximately 6000. Oil can be extracted from PDMS films with ethanol giving a volume dependent signal. Films and ethanol extracts can be used to monitor the concentration of dilbit present in model systems for riverbeds and real-life oil release scenarios. Oil was not observed adsorbed to UltraEverDry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds→French-language works237,207→