MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028631815

Functional outcome and multidimensional evaluation of patients with mutars® reconstructions post lower limb tumor resection and rehabilitation: Preliminary results

2019· article· en· W7028631815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrInSubria (University of Insubria) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationQuality of life (healthcare)GaitFemurGait trainingOrthopedic surgeryModalitiesActivities of daily livingTibia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct defects of the distal femur and proximal tibia after bone tumor resection. Improving patient’s autonomy and giving them a better quality of life are the main goals. Post-surgical rehabilitation is very relevant after surgery. The aim of this paper is to study the short and mean time functional outcomes in patients treated with Mutars® reconstructions after proximal and distal lower limb tumor resection with a multidimensional analysis and a standardized stabilometric examination. Twenty-one patients (7 male and 14 women, mean age and standard deviation: 61.76±14.68) affected by primitive bone tumor (28.6%) or metastatic bone tumor (71.4%), treated with MUTARS® reconstructions after proximal (71%), distal(23.8%) and both (4.8%) lower limb tumor resections, accepted to take part to the study. They were evaluated after one week (T0), one month (T1), three months (T2), six months (T3) and one year (T4) after surgery with standardized clinic evaluation and with multidimensional validated scales. Visual Analogic Scale (VAS during active movement), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), MusculoSkeletal Tumor Society rating (MSTS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score scale (TESS). Patients underwent to an instrumental standardized stabilometric test after one month from surgery and in following evaluations to measure standing balance. Patients underwent to a rehabilitation program during three months after surgery. There was a significant improvement of hip flexion range of movement (p level: 0.008), and gait modalities (without aids) after three months from surgery (p level 0.02). There was a significant reduction in VAS after one month of surgery (p level 0.00). It was observed an increase of the SPPB value at T3 (p level 0.01), of MSTS and TESS at T2. Balance stabilometric evaluation did not showed significant increase at each timing also if Romberg perimeter decrease progressively. These preliminary results showed that, oncological patients, affected by bone tumors or metastasis, surgical treated with MUTARS® implant and admitted to the rehabilitation programs, can improve their gait modalities and functional daily life outcomes, until three months from surgery. A large sample will allow, necessary to define standardized rehabilitation protocols after oncological orthopedic surgery, in order to introduce guidelines that can be applied routinely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it