MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028642822

Exploring the Dynamics of Occupants’ Thermal and Visual Perception, Physiological Responses, and Performance in Office Environments

2025· other· en· W7028642822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicProbability and Statistical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsASHRAE 90.1Thermal comfortTask (project management)Skin temperaturePerceptionWork (physics)Climate zonesBuilt environment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding occupant comfort in indoor environments is critical for designing spaces that promote well-being and efficiency. However, traditional assumptions regarding occupants’ thermal and visual preferences often result in energy inefficiency or discomfort. This thesis examines different approaches for acquiring occupant information—ranging from subjective feedback and physiological measurements—to better understand comfort preferences in varying environments. Additionally, this work addresses the gaps in comfort research, which is predominantly focused on the Global North, by conducting experimental studies in contrasting climatic regions (Montreal, Canada - ASHRAE Climate Zone 6, and Cairo, Egypt - ASHRAE Climate Zone 2B). These studies investigate the interplay between thermal and visual comfort domains under varied lighting and temperature conditions and their impact on physiological responses such as heart rate variability (HRV) and skin temperature (ST). Furthermore, thermal comfort analyses were conducted using wearable sensing technologies to monitor physiological signals, including electroencephalography (EEG), HRV, and ST. These analyses assess how thermal conditions influence comfort perceptions and task performance across different genders and locations, revealing significant variations in physiological responses to temperature and lighting conditions. The experiments were conducted in controlled office environments to simulate real-world conditions, and the data collected aimed to evaluate location-specific and gender-related differences in comfort and performance. Comparative analyses from experimental trials in Montreal and Cairo show notable differences in thermal comfort perception and task performance, with males being more sensitive to thermal conditions and location-specific variations affecting heart rate variability and skin temperature. These findings provide a foundation for developing adaptive building environments that can dynamically adjust indoor conditions to improve occupant well-being and energy efficiency. These findings offer valuable insights into the relationship between physiological responses, thermal comfort perceptions, and occupant performance in office environments, offering a pathway toward the integration of Occupant-Centric Control (OCC) strategies in future smart building environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it