Fasteignamarkaður Kanada. Eru fasteignir undirverðlagðar í Montréal?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ritgerðin fjallar um hvort fasteignir séu almennt undirverðlagðar á stór Montréal svæðinu í Quebéc fylki í Kanada. Umfjöllunin fer yfir eðli fasteigna sem hluta af eignasafni einstaklinga, áhættur sem því tengjast og hvaða áhrifavaldar það eru sem spila inn í fasteignaverð. Einnig er farið yfir hvort greining á þeim sé nothæf í þeim tilgangi að leggja mat á það hvort fasteignir á svæðinu séu almennt undirverðlagðar. \n\tNiðurstaða ritgerðarinnar leiddi í ljós að á sama tíma og efnahagurinn í Montréal hefur styrkst undanfarið og atvinnuleysi mælst í lægsta móti síðan í upphafi 21. aldarinnar hefur framboð fasteigna verið stöðugt bæði á sölumarkaði og leigumarkaði. Strangari skilyrði um lán frá fjármálastofnunum ásamt hækkandi vöxtum undanfarin misseri virðast til skemmri tíma hafa leitt til þess það að ungt fólk sæki í ríkari mæli á leigumarkaðinn frekar en að fjárfesta í fasteign.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.310 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".