MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028689961

Geochemistry and Basin Modeling Of Devonian-Mississippian Petroleum Systems in the Anadarko Basin

2019· dissertation· en· W7028689961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSaudi AramcoOklahoma State University
KeywordsOil shalePetroleumBasementMaceralPaleozoic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Woodford Shale and the overlying Mississippian Limestone constitute one of the prolific unconventional and conventional hydrocarbon targets in Northern Oklahoma. Technological advancement in drilling and production has allowed for the economic recovery of hydrocarbon from tight source-rock reservoirs. However, many challenges remain unexplained related to the variation in well performance and hydrocarbon composition. Many factors control hydrocarbon producibility from Devonian-Mississippian reservoirs, including rock mineralogy, thermal maturity and organic-richness. A collection of rock, crude-oil and fluid-inclusion samples were geochemically investigated to gain insight into their origin and thermal maturity. This study introduces an entirely new geochemical approach for the correlation of high-temperature fluid inclusions with their source rocks, using quantitative extended diamondoid analysis (QEDA). Mississippian mudrocks exhibit organic-rich units capable of generating hydrocarbon. Petroleum from Mississippian rocks is proven through source-rock and crude-oil correlation, sharing similar biomarker fingerprints. A collection of Mississippian biomarkers has been identified, including diterpenoids and extended tricyclic terpenes, reflecting the organic-matter source and depositional environment. Macerals of Mississippian rocks are characterized by the amorphous morphologies, whereas Woodford Shale macerals exhibit intact structures. According to mineralogy and sedimentology, six main facies were identified within the Mississippian mudrocks. Furthermore, Organic and sedimentological characteristics suggest shoaling-upward sequences in the Mississippian formation. Examined crude oil was grouped into three major families, each of which exhibits a unique geochemical signature. The first crude-oil family is derived from Mississippian end-member source rocks, while the third family is closely related to Woodford Shale source rock, and the second oil family represents a mixture of the two end-members. \nDiamondoids shed light into on mixed hydrocarbons at various levels of maturity, in which oils within the Anadarko Shelf and Sooner Trend Anadarko Basin Canadian and Kingfisher Counties (STACK) plays are mixed oils of uncracked and cracked hydrocarbons, whereas oils within central Oklahoma are unmixed and uncracked hydrocarbons. Based on geochemical evidence derived from fluid inclusions and crude oil, petroleum-migration timing is defined over four major episodes, with long-distance petroleum migration west of the Nemaha Uplift, and shortdistance petroleum migration at the east of the Nemaha Uplift. All generated geochemical data were integrated into a basin and petroleum systems approach with the aim of understanding major factors controlling the distribution and quality of hydrocarbons across the Devonian-Mississippian petroleum systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207