MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028772691

Flash Boiling Atomization of Suspension for Application of Suspension Plasma Spraying

2024· dissertation· en· W7028772691 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNozzleSuspension (topology)Thermal sprayingPlasmaSpray nozzleBoilingSuperheatingPlasma torchDeposition (geology)Solution precursor plasma spray
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suspension Plasma Spraying (SPS) is a thermal spray technique used to deposit sub-micron and nano-sized particles. The liquid is evaporated by exposing the suspension to the plasma jet. Then, the particles are melted and directed in the plasma jet to impact the substrate and form a coating. SPS has lower solid feed rates and deposition efficiency compared to other thermal spray techniques. Increasing particle concentration in the suspension can enhance the feedstock deposition rate, but high viscosity and nozzle clogging are issues.
\nTo address these issues, this study explores flash boiling atomization (FBA) as a novel injection method in SPS for high solids concentrations, up to 70 wt.%. FBA uses thermodynamic instability to break up a liquid jet. When superheated suspension is accelerated through a nozzle and its pressure drops below the saturation pressure, rapid boiling occurs. Vapor bubbles expand within the liquid jet, causing it to fragment into smaller parts. FBA has applications in various industries such as fuel injection, desalination, and pharmaceuticals. The main objective is to use FBA to inject high-solids suspensions into the plasma flow to create SPS coatings. 
\nSuspension injection in SPS can be axial or radial. In axial injection, fragmentation occurs inside the torch, while in radial injection, the suspension is injected from outside the torch into the plasma flow. Conventional radial injection methods include spray atomization, which creates disintegrated droplets, and mechanical injection, which produces a continuous jet. This study compared coatings made with FBA to those made with mechanical injection, assessing microstructure, deposition weight per pass, deposition efficiency, and coating thickness. Results indicated improvements across these parameters.
\nWater and ethanol are common suspension solvents. Water-based suspensions face challenges with atomization and evaporation resistance, impacting coating properties. FBA can improve fragmentation and prevent clogging by reducing viscosity and surface tension in the superheated state. The effect of high solids concentration and plasma power on coating microstructure, thickness per pass, deposition weight per pass, and deposition efficiency was investigated, showing that a dense coating microstructure with high solids deposition can be achieved using 70 wt.% suspension and a high power torch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207