MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028826633

The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on People Diagnosed With Schizophrenia: An Analysis of Factors Contributing to Black-White Disparities in Schizophrenia Outcomes

2023· article· en· W7028826633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalResearch@Fordham (Fordham University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental illnessSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Mental healthStigma (botany)Quality of life (healthcare)Outpatient clinicSocial supportPsychological interventionSocial stigma
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders pose significant challenges and impairments, with Black individuals disproportionately affected by these conditions. Racial disparities in schizophrenia diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes are well-documented, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study addresses the potential contribution of mental illness stigma to these disparities by examining its impact on treatment-seeking behavior, substance use as a means of aversive coping, and overall psychological wellbeing among Black people diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (PDWS).Methods: Data from the Recovery After Initial Schizophrenia Episode-Early Treatment Program (RAISE-ETP), a cluster randomized control trial conducted from 2009 to 2012, were utilized. A total of 404 participants were enrolled from 34 outpatient community mental health centers across the United States. Mental illness stigma was assessed using the Stigma Self-Report Scale (SSRS), depressive symptoms were measured with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), psychological wellbeing was evaluated using an abbreviated version of the Scales of Psychological Wellbeing (SPWB), and social support was assessed using the interpersonal relations subscale of the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Frequency of outpatient service use, psychiatric hospitalizations, and substance use types were also documented. T-tests and longitudinal path analysis was employed to explore the relationships among variables, the potential role of social support in buffering the impact of stigma, and Black-White racial differences in support for the proposed model.Results: While some racial differences emerged, including more outpatient visits by Black PDWS and less substance use, stigma did not directly predict wellbeing in the overall sample. Surprisingly, there was support for a relationship between stigma and depression symptom severity among White participants but not among Black participants. Social support did not significantly moderate the relationship between stigma and depression, although the moderation effect approached significance among Black participants. Model fit was equivalent across racial groups.Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of addressing stigma in interventions for PDWS, emphasizing its association with depression and substance use. It highlights the need for culturally sensitive, stigma-focused interventions tailored to the diverse experiences and needs of PDWS. Future research should further explore the complex interplay of stigma, depression, service utilization, substance use, social support, and race in shaping mental health outcomes among PDWS, with a focus on understanding and addressing racial disparities in schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it