MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028827088

Frédéric Naulet, Wagram (5 et 6 juillet 1809). Le canon tonne sur les bords du Danube

2010· review· fr· W7028827088 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2010
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcreLimitingNatural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur, Frédéric Naulet, est docteur en histoire et membre de la commission d’histoire militaire. Il a déjà publié, dans cette même collection, deux ouvrages consacrés respectivement à Eylau et Friedland. À l’occasion du bicentenaire de la campagne d’Autriche et de la bataille de Wagram, il nous livre ici un ouvrage très synthétique sur les opérations de cette campagne de 1809 qui, une fois de plus, voit la France et l’Autriche s’affronter sur les champs de bataille. Le recul et l’objectivi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicCentral European and Russian historical studiesFrench-language works237,207