Fascism & Antifa Episode 4: Digging at the historical roots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Radio Free Winnipeg's 4th episode of their series on Fascism & Antifa Scott and Greg talk about the historical roots of Fascism with specific attention to Fascist groups in Canada during the 1930s. In the second half of the episode Scott and Greg discuss the role of settler-colonialism in Canada, why liberalism can't defeat Fascism and how Fascists and racists use \\"free speech\\" to shield themselves. Correction In the episode Scott said that the Hyman libel act was passed in 1935 after the Battle of Old Market Square. In fact it was passed in 1934 just before the Battle of Old Market Square. Show Notes Running the Fascists out of Town https://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/running-the-fascists-out-of-town The Warning signs of Fascism on campus https://torontoist.com/2017/07/warning-signs-of-fascism-on-campus/ Tracking the Alt-Right in Toronto https://torontoist.com/2017/08/tracking-alt-right-toronto/ Twenty Five Theses on Fascism https://anarchiststudies.org/2017/11/30/twenty-five-theses-on-fascism-by-shane-burley/ Like us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/radiofreewinnipeg/ Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/Radio_Free_Wpg
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.686 | 0.098 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".