High-Dimensional Data Integration with Multiple Heterogeneous and Outlier Contaminated Tasks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data integration is the process of extracting information from multiple sources and analyzing different related data sets simultaneously. The aggregated information can reduce the sample biases caused by low-quality data, boost the statistical power for joint inference, and enhance the model prediction. Therefore, this dissertation focuses on the development and implementation of statistical methods for data integration.\n\nIn clinical research, the study outcomes usually consist of various patients' information corresponding to the treatment. Since the joint inference across related data sets can provide more efficient estimates compared with marginal approaches, analyzing multiple clinical endpoints simultaneously can better understand treatment effects. Meanwhile, the data from different research are usually heterogeneous with continuous and discrete endpoints. To alleviate computational difficulties, we apply the pairwise composite likelihood method to analyze the data. We can show that the estimators are consistent and asymptotically normally distributed based on the Godambe information. \n\nUnder high dimensionality, the joint model needs to select the important features to analyze the intrinsic relatedness among all data sets. The multi-task feature learning is widely used to recover this union support through the penalized M-estimation framework. However, the heterogeneity among different data sets may cause difficulties in formulating the joint model. Thus, we propose the mixed $\\ell_{2,1}$ regularized composite quasi-likelihood function to perform multi-task feature learning. In our framework, we relax the distributional assumption of responses, and our result establishes the sign recovery consistency and estimation error bounds of the penalized estimates. \n\nWhen data from multiple sources are contaminated by large outliers, the multi-task learning methods suffer efficiency loss. Next, we propose robust multi-task feature learning by combining the adaptive Huber regression tasks with mixed regularization. The robustification parameters can be chosen to adapt to the sample size, model dimension, and error moments while striking a balance between unbiasedness and robustness. We consider heavy-tailed distributions for multiple data sets that have bounded $(1+\\omega)$th moment for any $\\omega>0$. Our method is shown to achieve estimation consistency and sign recovery consistency. In addition, the robust information criterion can conduct joint inference on related tasks for consistent model selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".