MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028900442

Hot water epilepsy (HWE) familial and nonfamilial case reports

2022· article· en· W7028900442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathingReflex EpilepsyEpilepsyFamily historyReflex
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflex epilepsy is a form of epilepsy precipitated by a specific stimulus and events. Seizure precipitation by hot water during bathing is named as "hot water" or "bathing epilepsy" which is a rare and unique form of reflex epilepsy. It is especially common in Southern India and of higher frequency in Muslims among them. There are also isolated and rare case reports from Australia, Japan, Canada and the United States. A small series of patients with hot water epilepsy (HWE) was reported from Turkey. The cases with HWE may be sporadic or familial. Our aim is to outline the clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) features of four patients with hot water epilepsy, seen at our clinic. One of our patients has a family history of epilepsy. The second and third generation of family members had seizures during bathing. It is important to ask patients with HWE about bathing habits (pouring hot water over the head from a bowl), the temperature and amount of bathing water, the duration of bathing, any additional spontaneous seizures and family history. Sometimes this is enough to eliminate precipitating factors for treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi)Same topicTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsFrench-language works237,207