Fujitsuka Chikashi’s Studies on Park Jega: Focusing on the ‘Fujitsuka Chikashi Collection’ in the Harvard Yenching Library
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper I will introduce Park Jega's books in the "Fujitsuka Chikashi Collection" housed in the Harvard Yenching Library. Fujitsuka Chikashi (1879-1948), a professor of Chinese philosophy at Keijo Imperial University, started research on the interaction between Korean and Chinese scholars during the 18th to 19th centuries. He especially focused on the Joseon era Confucian scholar Kim Jeong-hui (1786-1856), on whom he wrote his PhD dissertation, while at Tokyo Imperial University. He collected many books and letters of Joseon Confucian scholars, and some of these are housed in the Harvard Yenching Library. These works are not so important to the study of Fujitsuka's own works, but are invaluable for the lifht they shed on academic interaction in East Asia durin the 18th to 19th centuries. This paper will focus on Park Jega's works in particular, and will also look at Fujitsuka's notes related to those works. After this I will make a comparison with Fujitsuka's own writings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".