MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7028967035

Harm reduction interventions for young people with first-episode psychosis who continue to use cannabis

2024· dissertation· en· W7028967035 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsCannabisPsychological interventionHarm reductionIntervention (counseling)Effects of cannabisPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In young people with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), cannabis use is widespread and associated with a significantly worsened prognosis. Few cannabis-specific interventions for this population have been evaluated; most have focused on ceasing or reducing cannabis use, and none are considered highly effective in addressing cannabis use. For many young people with FEP who use cannabis, abstinence-focused approaches may be unappealing or unrealistic options potentially impacting intervention engagement or outcomes. Harm reduction interventions, which seek to reduce cannabis use-related harms rather than requiring abstinence, may present an appealing alternative to young people with FEP who continue using cannabis; few interventions have implemented this approach. Further, there is a scarcity of studies documenting preferences of young people with FEP for cannabis harm reduction interventions or evaluating cannabis harm reduction interventions in this population. Aims: This thesis aims to (a) synthesize the evidence on efficacy of preventive interventions focusing on cannabis use for people with psychosis (review); (b) determine the preferences of young people with FEP using cannabis in relation to key characteristics of cannabis harm reduction interventions (survey); and (c) describe the development of a technology-based harm reduction intervention for young people with FEP who use cannabis, and its associated pilot trial (protocol). Methods: Three studies were conducted. Review: Six databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions aiming to reduce cannabis use-related harms or prevent cannabis use disorder in people with psychosis. Two independent reviewers assessed eligible studies for effectiveness and reporting quality. Intervention effectiveness was described by assessing cannabis-related harms and use outcomes. Survey: A survey, combining two discrete choice experiments (DCE) and conventional survey methodology, was developed to document preferences for cannabis harm reduction interventions. This survey was administered to 89 youth in Canada having FEP and using cannabis. One DCE focused on core attributes of harm reduction interventions (DCE 1) and the second on attributes of boosters (DCE 2). We analyzed these using mixed ranked-ordered logistic regression models. Conventional survey questions on preferences were analyzed using summary statistics. Protocol: A brief, technology-based cannabis harm reduction intervention for young people with FEP using cannabis, called the Cannabis Harm- reducing App to Manage Practices Safely (CHAMPS), was developed to complement FEP standard care. A pilot RCT aiming to recruit 100 young people with FEP and using cannabis was designed to assess the intervention acceptability and the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial in this population and with this intervention. Results: Review: Five studies were assessed, none of which measured cannabis use-related harms or demonstrated clear efficacy in reducing cannabis use in young people with psychosis. All studies had high risk of bias. Survey: Preferred characteristics for cannabis-focused harm reduction interventions (DCE 1) were: shorter sessions; less frequent sessions; shorter interventions; and technology-based interventions. Preferences for post-intervention boosters (DCE 2) included opting into boosters and having shorter boosters. Protocol: The protocol describing the development of CHAMPS and its pilot RCT was published; the pilot RCT is currently underway. Significance: Few cannabis-specific interventions for young people with FEP have been conducted, none demonstrating clear efficacy or focusing on harm reduction outcomes. Survey findings suggest an interest in cannabis harm reduction interventions and highlight preferred characteristics of young people with FEP for cannabis harm reduction interventions. These findings can guide the design of cannabis harm reductions interventions, as with CHAMPS. CHAMPS represents a novel cannabis harm reduction intervention for young people with FEP who use cannabis, and its associated pilot RCT has the potential to advance knowledge for scientists regarding acceptability and feasibility of implementing cannabis harm reduction interventions in the cannabis and early psychosis fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)→Same topicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction→French-language works237,207→