MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029018652

Hardware Design and Implementation of an Electromagnetic Levitation System in an Additive Manufacturing Environment

2022· dissertation· en· W7029018652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Regulation and Crises
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLevitationEnclosureMagnetic levitationElectromagnetic coilElectromagnetic suspensionConcentricSoftwareInductanceMagnet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic Levitation and Additive Manufacturing are two promising fields with ever growing interest in several industrial settings. There is, however, negligible overlap between the two fields. This research aims to combine the ability of electromagnetism to successfully levitate an aluminum disc using Electrodynamic Suspension (EDS), with Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) based additive manufacturing to enhance the complexity of fabricated objects. This provides a higher degree of freedom for manufacturing, and gives the user the ability to deposit material on the flip side of substrate, all through just one print activity.
\n
\nElectromagnetic system designed for this research comprises of two sets of oppositely wound concentric coils, seated in a pure-iron core. An aluminum disc is selected for levitation purposes due to its high compatibility with the additive manufacturing environment. ANSYS Maxwell, a FEMM based software is selected for design of the system. The coils are optimized for high levitation forces in the axial (Z-axis) direction, as well as restoration forces in the lateral (R-axis) direction using a 5ARMS input supply, in the range of 50 - 1000Hz. A thermal analysis is conducted to ensure system suitability for 20 minutes of activity in an additive manufacturing machine.
\n
\nIntrinsic coil parameters such as inductance and its reactance effects are investigated through resonant frequency and time constant step response analyses. Low and high voltage experiments are conducted to correlate system output current and magnetic field density with simulations. An enclosure is constructed according to CSA (Canadian Standards Association) guidelines to perform experiments at 300VRMS , 1.5kW.
\n
\nExperimental debugging is performed to tune system performance to optimal capability. The relative permeability of the core is studied at low magnetic field density outputs and corrected accordingly. The strength of coils is established, and magnetomotive force of the overall system is increased using a custom variable resistor setup in parallel with one set of coils. The levitative ability of the system is improved and matched to simulations. Finally, levitation is accomplished, with and without a payload suspension, to show viability for additive manufacturing applications.
\n
\nFuture work is discussed to expand further on current progress and highlight drawbacks of the established system. Recommendations are made to modify system components based on their material and geometric characteristics. A possible control model is discussed to ensure stability of levitation. The viability of magnetic levitation for additive manufacturing is hence established, and novel results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicGlobal Financial Regulation and CrisesFrench-language works237,207