Heiligungsverständnis und Verkündigung bei Robert Pearsall Smith
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robert Pearsall Smith played an important role within the Holiness Movement.Within a few years his teachings about "Holiness through faith" spread through Europe and had an important impact on movements like Keswick and the German "Heiligungsbewegung".The purpose of this master thesis is to show the influence of his understanding of holiness on his preaching.Due to the importance for the further analysis of his thoughts on holiness, which were often governed by his experiences, an outline of the Smith's life is given to get the historical background.Afterwards Smiths understanding of holiness regarding his view on sin, separation of justification and sanctification and spiritual baptism is discussed, including other prominent opinions of the holiness movement.With these results his preaching is examined with an emphasis on the rhetorical analysis of two sermons and the significance of emotion, staging and performance.A correlation between his preaching and his understanding of holiness can be found in Smith's use of emotion in his sermons in contrast to his theoretical concept of will based on faculty psychology.From a modern perspective this could have lead to the fact, that the audience of Smith, who had experienced emotions in the performative act of a spiritual baptism, felt manipulated after Smith lost his credibility in the scandal of Brigthon 1875.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".