A importância das tipologias de hipertensos no comportamento de prescrição dos médicos de medicina geral e familiar em Portugal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo teve como finalidade investigar a importância das tipologias de utentes com Hipertensão Arterial na aproximação terapêutica dos médicos de Medicina Geral e Família: em Portugal Continental. Pretendeu-se investigar que: A prescrição do médico é alterada em função das tipologias do utente hipertenso (tipo de doenças, idade, sexo, raça, rendimento, nível de escolaridade. Trata-se de um estudo de natureza exploratória, que na primeira fase é de carácter qualitativo, tendo sido desenvolvidas entrevistas realizadas a médicos de Medicina Geral e Familiar com um ficheiro de utentes hipertensos em vários Centros de Saúde da Região da Grande Lisboa. Seguiu-se uma fase quantitativa, com base num inquérito por questionário, depois de ser selecionada uma amostra aleatória de dois mil cento e setenta e oitenta (2180) médicos de Medicina Geral e Familial’ em Portugal Continental. A presente investigação confirma a importância das tipologias no comportamento de prescrição dos médicos de Medicina Geral e Familiar no tratamento da HTA em Portugal Continental. /ABSTRACT - The main form of this study investigates the importance of typologies of patients with Arterial Hypertension about the therapeuthic decision of medical prescription in the General and Familiar Medicine in Portugal Continental. It was intended to investigate two different hypotheses relationed with the medical prescription: (1) The regime of medical prescription modifies in function of the typologies of the hypertensive patient (type of illnesses, age, sex), (2) These patient typologies define the existence of a inter and intra therapeutic medical classes. One is about a study of qualitative and quantitative nature which was developed in some Centers of Health of the Region of the Great Lisbon, through interviews carried through doctors of General and Familiar Medicine with a filing-cabinet of hypertensive patients. This present research confirms the importance of the patient typologies in the prescription behaviour of the General and Familiar doctors in the treatment of the Arterial Hypertension in Continental Portugal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".