Her-Story: Her Voice in Franco-American History
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Her-story is real Franco-American women talking about real issues as they learned to navigate a man’s world. Women for the first time were entering the workforce to help support their families. Utilizing primary sources, such as oral histories, this thesis provides a first-hand look at four women who vary in age, have different family situations, different education levels, as well as different social situations, and gives us a snapshot into their early lives. These four women have graciously provided details, which bring us back to a time when mills and factories flourished as they ran 24/7 and owners got rich off the backs of the workers, paying them a pittance for too many hours of work in poor conditions. For many, their strength lay in their family and their faith, thus making religion a very important part of this paper as well. Her-story is meant to answer the question, who are the women who worked in the mills? For many women, this was their first time working outside the home, as coming from the farm, their work was at home raising the children and taking care of the home. Her-story gives them a chance to speak up with regards to a time in history which is little spoken of: a time of transition for French Canadians as they settled in New England towns and worked in mills and factories. Her-story examines the major facets of women’s lives: family, education, religion, community, and work. It scrutinizes them individually and collectively to give a picture of the emotional backdrop of an earlier time in American history, when discrimination against others was prevalent and territories such as “petit Canada” were safe places to be, a place where traditions and language were able to flourish until states put a ban on speaking French in school. As religion was also important, they even petitioned for a French-speaking priest so they could have their masses in their language. This thesis focuses on 1) “traditional” family: how that meant something different to each of the women interviewed, the size of traditional French families, and how that has changed; 2) education: who was able to be educated, parish school versus public school, and language utilized in the school; 3) community: petit Canada was a safe haven for many French Canadians with family nearby; 4) religion: keeping their faith and providing a place to practice their faith was important. Each of the women had a different perspective on how these items impacted their family and the overall effect on them personally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".