Highlights of the La Joya Coyotes 2004-2005 football season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recording contains locker room talk by head coach Oscar Villasenor, highlights of the La Joya Coyotes vs. Brownsville Rivera Raiders game, La Joya Coyotes vs. Laredo Alexander Bulldogs, La Joya Coyotes vs. Economedes Jaguars, La Joya Coyotes vs. Corpus Christi Tigers, La Joya Coyotes vs. Corpus Christi King, La Joya Coyotes vs. McAllen High Bulldogs, La Joya Coyotes vs. McAllen Memorial Mustangs, La Joya Coyotes vs. Nikki Rowe Warriors, La Joya Coyotes vs. Sharyland Rattlers, and the La Joya Coyotes vs. Rio Grande City Rattlers game./="/">/="/">It also includes the following bi-district playoff game: La Joya Coyotes vs. Laredo United Longhorns, as well as the Battle of the Valley Giants game: La Joya Coyotes vs. Harlingen Cardinals, and the state quarter finalist game: La Joya Coyotes vs. Judson Rockets. 2005 Roster can be found here: https://perma.cc/S4PU-62C8
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".