MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029103243

Hamîduddîn el-Ferâhî (ö. 1930) ve Niẓāmu’l-Kur’ân ve Te’vîlu’l-Furkān bi’l-Furkān adlı tefsiri

2020· dissertation· tr· W7029103243 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)ExegesisSubject (documents)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hamîduddîn el-Ferâhî (1863-1930) Hindistan’da yetişmiş en önemli müfessirlerden biridir. Niẓāmu’l-Kur’ân ve Te’vîlu’l-Furkān bi’l-Furkān adlı tefsiri vefatı nedeniyle tamamlanamayan Ferâhî, gerek Hindistan gerekse diğer Müslüman coğrafyada çok sayıda ilim adamı üzerinde etkili olmuştur. Tefsir metodu ve ilmi kişiliği üzerine farklı dillerde ilmi araştırmalar yapılan Ferâhî hakkında Türkçe’de sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Müellifin ilmi kişiliği ve Niẓāmu’l-Kur’ân tefsiri daha önce Türkiye’de akademik çalışma düzeyinde incelenmemiştir. 
\nTezimiz, bir giriş ve iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Giriş bölümünde konunun seçilme nedeni, araştırmada takip edilen yöntem ve ilgili literatüre ilişkin bilgi verilmiştir. Birinci bölümde müfessirimizin yetiştiği çevre, ilmi kişiliği ve eserleri tanıtılmıştır. İkinci bölümde Ferâhî’nin Kur’an’ın Kur’an’la tefsiri ve tenâsüb yöntemleriyle yakın ilişkisi olan nazm metoduyla ele aldığı sure tefsirleri rivâyet tefsiri, dirâyet tefsiri ve Kur’an ilimleri yönüyle ele alınıp değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmamızda Kur’an yorumunda sure ve Kur’an bütünlüğünün esas alınmasını öneren Ferâhî’nin Niẓāmu’l-Kur’ân eseri, tefsirinde izlediği yöntemler ve ulaştığı sonuçlar ortaya konularak şekil ve içerik bakımından incelenmiştir. Ferâhî’nin Kur’an’ın doğru anlaşılması için geliştirmeye çalıştığı tevil metodolojisi, geçmiş ve çağdaş müfessirlerin görüşleriyle mukayese edilmiştir. 
\nNiẓāmu’l-Kur’ân son dönem Kur’an araştırmalarında büyük ilgi gören surelerin yapısal ve tematik bütünlüğü ve Kur’an’ın Kur’an’la tefsiri yönteminin uygulandığı en iddialı tefsirlerdendir. Bu tez çalışmasında, Niẓāmu’l-Kur’ân tefsirinin genel özellikleri incelenmiş ve Ferâhî’nin surelerin bir bütün olduğu düşüncesinden hareketle geliştirmeye çalıştığı tevil metodolojisinin bir yönteme dönüşme imkânı, tefsir ve Kur’an ilimleri araştırmalarına olumlu katkısı ve zaaf yönleri değerlendirilmiştir. 
\n
\n
\n--------------------
\nHamiduddin al-Farahi (1863-1930) is one of the most important glossators of India. Farahi whose work of exegesis Niẓām al-Qur’ān wa Ta’wīl al-Furqān bi al-Furqān was left incomplete on his death, influenced many scholars in India and other Muslim regions. There are limited number of studies on Farahi in Turkish who has been studied in several languages in terms of his exegesis method and scholarly personality. Scholarly characteristics and Niẓām al-Qur’ān exegesis haven’t been studied in Turkey on an academic study level.
\nThis study consists of one introduction and two chapters. In the introduction, we provided information as to why we chose this subject, which method we adopted and the previous related literature. In the first chapter, we introduced the environment in which the author grew up, his scholarly personality and his works. In the second chapter, we examined the surah interpretations which Farahi approached with the Nazm method that has a close relationship with his methods of interpreting Qur’an with Qur’an and coherence, from the aspect of riwayah exegesis (narrative), dirayah exegesis (rational) and Qur’anic sciences. In the study, we analyzed Niẓām al-Qur’ān of Farahi who suggests basing on the inner coherence of surahs and Qu’ran when interpreting Qur’an, in terms of its form and content by propounding the methods adopted in the exegesis and its conclusions. We also compared Farahi’s allegorical interpretation method (tawil) which he endeavored to improve for better understanding of Qur’an, with the views of previous and contemporary glossators.
\n\tNiẓām al-Qur’ān is one of the most assertive exegesis works on which the methods of structural and thematic integrity of surahs and interpreting Qur’an with Qur’an that have recently drawn great interest in Qur’anic studies are applied. In this study, we researched the overall characteristics of Niẓām al-Qur’ān exegesis and the possibility of evolving Farahi’s allegorical method which he endeavored to improve based on the idea that the all surahs are separate wholes within themselves into a technique, positive influence of this method on the works of exegesis and Qur’anic sciences and its weaknesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0180.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it