MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029136175

The impacts of improving Brazil's transportation infrastructure on the world soybean market

2010· book· en· W7029136175 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckTransportation infrastructureRevenueYield (engineering)Market shareGovernment (linguistics)Economic impact analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lack of adequate transportation infrastructure in Brazil has been a bottleneck for the\nsoybean producers for many years. Moreover, the costly inland transportation incurred\nfrom this bottleneck has resulted in a loss in competitiveness for Brazil compared to\nother exporting countries, especially the United States. If transportation costs are\nreduced by introducing improved infrastructure, Brazil is expected to increase its\ncompetitiveness in the world soybean market by increasing its exports and producer\nrevenues. On the other hand, the United States and other significant soybean competing\nexporting countries are expected to lose market share as well as producer revenues.\nThis study uses a spatial equilibrium model to analyze transportation\ninfrastructure improvements proposed by the Brazilian government vis-à-vis enhance the\nnation’s soybean transportation network. The analyzed transportation improvements are:\n(i) the development of the Tapajós-Teles Pires waterway; (ii) the completion of the BR-\n163 highway; (iii) the construction of the Mortes-Araguaia waterway; (iv) the Ferronorte\nrailroad expansion to Rondonópolis and the linkage between the city of Rio Verde to\nUberlândia; and (v) the Ferropar railroad expansion to the city of Dourados. The model\nspecifies the Brazilian inland transportation network and the international ocean shipments. The model divides Brazil into 18 excess supply regions and 8 excess demand\nregions. The competing exporting countries are the United States, Argentina, Rest of\nSouth America (Bolivia, Paraguay, and Uruguay), Canada, and India. The importing\ncountries are composed of China, European Union, Southeast Asia, Mexico, and the\nRest of the World.\nResults suggest these proposed transportation improvements yield potential\nnoteworthy gains to Brazil with producer revenues increasing more than $500 million\nand exports increasing by 177 thousand metric tons. Consequently, the world soybean\nprice declines by $1.16 per metric ton and producer revenues and exports in the United\nStates fall by 63 thousand metric tons and $104.89 million, respectively. Although the\nabsolute gains in price, revenues, and exports for Brazil are considerable, they only\nrepresent in relative changes 1.48, 2.35, and 0.32 percent, respectively. Similarly, the\nloss in price, revenue, and export value for the United States is also low, declining by\n0.23, 0.23, and 0.12 percent, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)Same topicLogistics and Infrastructure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207