Il francese del Québec attraverso l'analisi del film Mommy di Xavier Dolan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'elaborato presenta un approfondimento sul francese del Québec attraverso l'analisi del film Mommy del regista canadese Xavier Dolan nella versione originale, nella versione sottotitolata in francese di Francia e nella versione doppiata in italiano. \nIl primo capitolo introduce la storia della lingua quebecchese, la sua evoluzione dal francese dei coloni e quello attuale e gli aspetti linguistici che caratterizzano questa varietà. \nIl secondo capitolo presenta il regista canadese Xavier Dolan, la sua biografia, il suo stile e introduce il film Mommy. \nIl terzo e ultimo capitolo analizza il concetto di turpiloquio contestualizzato nella cultura quebecchese, francese e italiana, e lo esamina attraverso l'analisi del tipo di turpiloquio, della frequenza e delle scelte traduttive realizzate nelle tre versioni del film Mommy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".