MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029188245

Initiatives atikamekw d’affirmation et de mise en valeur des savoirs et du territoire

2021· other· fr· W7029188245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2021
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Identity (music)Relations of production
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Nation autochtone atikamekw nehirowisiw compte aujourd’hui environ 8000 membres, qui vivent principalement dans les communautés de Wemotaci, Opticiwan, et Manawan, situées au Centre du Québec (Canada), dans les régions de la Haute-Mauricie et de Lanaudière. Les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok n’ont jamais cédé leur territoire et leur souveraineté et continuent, dans le contexte néocolonial contemporain et en dépit des contraintes grandissantes, de maintenir leurs relations au Nitaskinan, leur territoire ancestral, et de transmettre leurs savoirs propres. Dans le cadre de cette recherche et lors d’un terrain à la communauté de Manawan à l’été 2019, je me suis intéressée à certaines des initiatives mises en œuvre par les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok afin de maintenir et d’affirmer ces relations et de favoriser la transmission intergénérationnelle des savoirs locaux. Il est entre autres question des cartographies développées par les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok ainsi que du tourisme mis en place à Manawan. Ce mémoire tente ainsi de mettre en lumière certains des défis et des enjeux que rencontrent les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok dans leur affirmation identitaire et la mise en œuvre de leurs projets de vie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207