Improvement of C60's calculated electron-phonon coupling using hybrid functional
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Superconductivity in doped C60 crystals is generally admitted to be phonon mediated. However, the electron-phonon coupling calculated within density functional theory do not agree with measured values, in contrast to others phonon related properties. This discrepancy hasn't been understood yet. Up to now, only calculations using the local density approximation for the exchange-correlation functional (LDA) were performed. In this study, we demonstrate that using exact-exchange functionals increases the calculated couplings, bringing it closer to experiment, while others properties, such as geometry and phonon frequencies, are little affected. We investigate how such an improvement is possible while little change is seen on more commonly calculated properties. This work was supported by grants from NSERC and FQRNT and by the NSF under Grant No. DMR07-05941 and the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The computational resources were provided by the Réseau québécois de calcul haute perfomance (RQCHP).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it