Improvement of C60's calculated electron-phonon coupling using hybrid functional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Superconductivity in doped C60 crystals is generally admitted to be phonon mediated. However, the electron-phonon coupling calculated within density functional theory do not agree with measured values, in contrast to others phonon related properties. This discrepancy hasn't been understood yet. Up to now, only calculations using the local density approximation for the exchange-correlation functional (LDA) were performed. In this study, we demonstrate that using exact-exchange functionals increases the calculated couplings, bringing it closer to experiment, while others properties, such as geometry and phonon frequencies, are little affected. We investigate how such an improvement is possible while little change is seen on more commonly calculated properties. This work was supported by grants from NSERC and FQRNT and by the NSF under Grant No. DMR07-05941 and the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The computational resources were provided by the Réseau québécois de calcul haute perfomance (RQCHP).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".