MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7029238546

Investigation of endothermal doublets occurring in the thermal decomposition of Ca(OH)2

2006· article· en· W7029238546 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential scanning calorimetryDecompositionEndothermic processMicrocrystallineRelative humidityNitrogenThermal decompositionAtmosphere (unit)Calorimetry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of at least two different forms of Ca(OH)2 is confirmed by the results of a thermoanalytical study on the decomposition and re-hydration characteristics of Ca(OH)2. The study comprised a series of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments (at temperatures up to 700°C) performed in an atmosphere of a continuous flow of nitrogen pre-conditioned to various relative humidities ranging from 12 to 100%. The emergence of two separate and distinct decomposition endotherms occurred. The endothermic peak temperatures were dependent on the relative humidity and temperature history of the Ca(OH)2 samples. Exposure of CaO to higher temperatures and different humidities would appear to promote the formation of both crystalline and microcrystalline products. Under these conditions, higher temperatures give rise to formation of very crystalline products and after some time, vapor phase exposure promotes the formation of microcrystalline products. Factors affecting the formation of the different forms of Ca(OH)2 are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→