Incarceration, reserves, and indigenous deprivation and death in 20th century Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce chapitre étudie l'impact de l'immobilisation forcée des peuples autochtones sur les réserves indiennes de la Colombie-Britannique, au Canada, au début du xxe siècle. Ces réserves font partie d'un système carcéral destiné à seconder les objectifs colonialistes. Cet article décrit le rôle de la carcéralité et de la création de réserves dans le processus de colonisation du Canada, la surveillance et l'enfermement des peuples autochtones dans les réserves ainsi que les impacts de ces actes coloniaux sur les corps des indigènes This chapter investigates the impact of the forced immobilisation of Indigenous peoples on Indian reserves in British Columbia, Canada, in the early 20th century. We frame reserves as part of a carceral system intended to further the goals of settler colonialism. This chapter describes the role of carcerality and the creation of reserves in the colonization of Canada, the surveillance and deprivation of Indigenous people on reserves, and the impacts of these colonial acts on Indigenous bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".