MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029331138

Interview with Timmy Stützle (Pt.2)

2020· other· en· W7029331138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCybernetics and Technology in Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanInterviewCode (set theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ross Levitan and Brandon Piller are joined for Part 2 of their interview with Ottawa Senators 3rd overall pick in the 2020 NHL Draft, Timmy Stützle. He discusses what he's focussed on improving, whether he would he prefer to play in Mannheim or Belleville, what he knows about the City of Ottawa, which German players he looked up to and more! Ross and Brandon also debate who Tim should play with on his line to start his career in the NHL....and in Belleville. Follow us on Twitter: @SensCentralSupport us by supporting our sponsors!!! BuiltGo: Visit BuiltGO.com and use promo code \\"LOCKED,\\" and you'll get 30% off your next order. Use promo code \\"LOCKED\\" for 30% off at builtGO.com LET'S GO! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7180.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicCybernetics and Technology in SocietyFrench-language works237,207