MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029384353

Investigation of genotype by country interactions for growth traits for Charolais populations in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and USA

2004· article· en· W7029384353 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeritabilityTraitGenotypeMaternal effectGenetic correlationGenetic variationQuantitative genetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evidence of heterogeneity of parameters and genotype by country interactions was investigated for birth weight (BWT),weaning weight (WWT) and postweaning gain (PWG) between Australian (AUS), Canadian (CAN), New Zealand (NZ) andUSA populations of Charolais cattle. An animal model was fit to data sets for each individual country to compare the within countryparameter estimates for homogeneity. The direct heritability estimates of BWT in AUS (0.34) and NZ (0.31) were lessthan CAN (0.55) and USA (0.47). Maternal BWT heritabilities (0.13–0.18), direct WWT heritabilities (0.22–0.27), andmaternal WWT heritabilities (0.12–0.18) were similar across all four countries. Direct PWG heritability for AUS (0.14) wassmaller than the same estimate in the other three countries (0.24–0.31). The phenotypic variances for all three traits were similaracross AUS, CAN and USA; however, NZ was higher for BWT and WWT and lower for PWG. A multiple trait animal modelthat considered each trait as a different trait in each country was also fit to the data for pairs of countries. Direct (maternal)estimated genetic correlations for BWT for AUS–CAN, AUS–USA, USA–CAN, NZ–CAN and NZ–USA were 0.88 (0.86),0.85 (0.82), 0.88 (0.82), 0.85 (0.83), and 0.84 (0.80), respectively. Direct (maternal) estimated genetic correlations for WWT forAUS–CAN, AUS–USA, USA–CAN, NZ–CAN and NZ–USA were 0.96 (0.91), 0.95 (0.90), 0.95 (0.91), 0.95 (0.92), and0.95 (0.92), respectively. Direct estimated genetic correlations for PWG for AUS–CAN, AUS–USA, USA–CAN, NZ–CANand NZ–USA were 0.89, 0.91, 0.94, 0.90, and 0.91, respectively. The magnitude of the across-country genetic correlationsindicates that genotype by country interactions were biologically unimportant. However, strong evidence exists forheterogeneity of parameters across the countries for some traits and effects. Therefore, combining these countries into one singleanalysis to produce a common set of genetic values will depend on the development of methods to adjust for heterogeneousparameters for models containing both direct and maternal effects, and for circumstances where constant variance ratios orheritabilities are not present across populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTechnology, Environment, Urban PlanningFrench-language works237,207