MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029471444

Intra-Industry Trade between the United States and Canada

2004· article· en· W7029471444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopolistic competitionRivalryOligopolyProduct differentiationProduct (mathematics)Competition (biology)Proxy (statistics)Variable (mathematics)Manufacturing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, US - Canada trade patterns were analyzed and the determinants of US - Canada Intra - Industry Trade (IIT) were empirically tested. IIT is explained using the new trade theories, including the Neo-factor Proportions Model and Monopolistic Competition Model under General Trade Equilibrium (instead of the Functional Hypotheses). The following three hypotheses that are empirically tested in this paper. The level of IIT is expected to be relatively high in industries: 1) with high levels of product differentiation, which is tested by the following proxies such as advertising expenses, value added and capital intensity, 2) typified by having economies of scale, which is tested by variable such as the average production cost; and 3) in which intense oligopolistic rivalry is common, where the oligopolistic rivalry is tested by proxy such as the world market share of US exports. Data were collected from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the US Economic Census and proxies were developed to test each hypothesis. Three regression procedures were run. Results of the final model specification yielded statistically significant results and provided empirical evidence in support of the above three hypotheses. The findings resulting from this research include: First, the significant result of product differentiation variable - advertisement expenses, in manufacturing industries showed that advertisement expenses only significantly influenced the level of US - Canada IIT in manufacturing sector. This result is consistent with the observation that higher degrees of advertisement spending is associated with manufacturing industries because the existence of higher degrees of horizontal product differentiation in this sector as compared to other industry sectors. Large investment in advertisement is the direct result of high degree of horizontal product differentiation. Second, the regression results suggest that in the agricultural sector economies of scale is more likely to lead to comparative advantage in production. The greater economies of scale in agriculture sector result in a higher level of one-way trade, thus a lower level of IIT component of total trade. Third, industries with low capital intensity are more likely t? be linked with early stages of the product cycle and a low level of product differentiation. Therefore, a low degree of IIT should be observed in these industries. Fourth, the larger the international market share of US industries, the more international oligopolistic market power US companies have over foreign companies, the more difficult it is for Canadian products to enter US market. This leads to a low level of IIT in these industries. Finally, this research indicates that by mixing three and four digit SITC industries in one empirical study can cause misleading result, so it is critical to keep the same industry aggregation level for future empirical IIT study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it