La fragilisation du lien de confiance au sein de l’intervention sociale en protection de la jeunesse : Peut-on blâmer le droit ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte de la protection de la jeunesse, la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse (LPJ) édicte les pouvoirs et responsabilités des intervenantes sociales œuvrant à la Direction de la protection de la jeunesse (DPJ) et encadre la relation entre celles-ci et les familles. Cette loi octroie aux intervenantes un double mandat, qui implique à la fois celui de l’aide et celui du contrôle et de la surveillance. Selon la littérature relative aux pratiques sociales dans ce domaine, les familles suivies par la DPJ peuvent se sentir observées, traquées, dénuées d’intimité et considèrent difficile de laisser entrer une étrangère dans leur vie privée. Dans ce texte, l’auteure se questionne sur l’incidence des normes législatives en protection de la jeunesse sur l’intervention sociale de la DPJ et soumet l’hypothèse que la LPJ crée un cadre juridique où il est difficile d’établir un lien de confiance entre les familles et les intervenantes sociales puisque le contrôle et la surveillance peuvent prendre le dessus sur l’aide à apporter aux familles. Ce lien de confiance semble non seulement fragilisé par l’ampleur des pouvoirs et responsabilités octroyés aux intervenantes sociales par la loi, mais aussi par la judiciarisation des dossiers à la Chambre de la jeunesse.\nIn the context of youth protection, the Youth Protection Act (YPA) of Québec sets out the powers and responsibilities of the social workers of the Direction of Youth Protection (DYP) and governs the relationship between them and families. This law gives social workers a double mandate, which implies assistance and control and surveillance. According to the literature on social practices in this field, families monitored by the DYP may feel observed, stalked, deprived of privacy, and find it difficult to let a stranger into their private life. Thus, in this text, the author questions the impact of legislative standards on the YPD's social intervention and hypothesizes that the YPA creates a legal framework where it is difficult to establish a bond of trust between families and social workers since control and surveillance take precedence over the assistance to be provided to families. This bond of trust is not only weakened by the extent of the powers and responsibilities granted to social workers by the YPA, but also by the judicialization at the Court of Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.078 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".