La buserelina en programas de superovulación para transferencia de embriones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de éste trabajo fue comparar la respuesta superovulatoria y la cantidad y calidad de embriones recuperados en vacas Holstein en la Sabana de Bogotá, mediante la aplicación de buserelina en el día 6 del ciclo estral, antes de iniciar el esquema de superovulación . El trabajo se realizó en la Sabana de Bogotá, a 2640 msnm y una temperatura promedio de 12° C. Se emplearon veinte bovinos hembra de la raza Holstein a los cuales se les aplicó FSH (Vetrepharm Inc, Ontario,Canadá) para inducir superovulación, en los dias 11, 12 13 y 14 del ciclo estral, con una dosis total de 20 cc, y PGF2a (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) con la última dosis de FSH, 3 cc im. A diez de ellas (grupo tratamiento) se les aplicó Buserelina (Hoechst Roussel Vet, München, Alemania) en el día 6 del ciclo estral, antes de iniciar el tratamiento superovulatorio. Las diez vacas restantes se consideraron como grupo control. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que hubo diferencia ssgnificativa entre el grupo tratamiento y el grupo control respecto a la respuesta superovulatoria (p< 0,05) No se encontró diferencia significativa en el número de embriones recuperados en ambos grupos (p> 0,05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".