La quête : les archives des Soeurs de la Providence dans le cadre d'une recherche en histoire sur l'enfermement asilaire des femmes au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette note de recherche rend compte des étapes méthodologiques, dans le cadre d'un projet de recherche sur l'histoire de l'enfermement asilaire des femmes au Québec entre 1873 et 1921, mettant en lumière l'importance cruciale de consulter les Archives Providence, archives privées de la communauté religieuse des Soeurs de la Providence, fondatrice de l'Asile Saint-Jean-de-Dieu en 1873. Leurs archives conservent de nombreux documents relatifs, entre autres, à la première école de gardes-malades au Québec spécialisée dans le traitement des maladies nerveuses et mentales qu'elles ont fondée en 1912. Un pan important au coeur de cette recherche permettant de découvrir les approches thérapeutiques dont a fait l'objet la population féminine de l'institution asilaire. Ce cas bien particulier expose indubitablement les marques encore profondes laissées par une génération d'historiens ayant souscrit à une histoire anticléricale. Un courant historiographique qui inévitablement a fragilisé les relations entre les communautés religieuses et les historiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".