The 1975 Lebanese Civil War(s): The origin of conflict and a conflict of origins
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores how the beginning of the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), a ravaging and recent conflict, is interpreted and studied in scholarly works.The lengthy Lebanese historiography on the conflict is riddled with various contradictions on all matters regarding the cause and origin of the Civil War.In this essay, four carefully selected narratives will be introduced and dissected to ultimately reveal the fealties and boundaries in scholarly works.The essay is divided into several chapters in which both the specific type of narrative and its framing devices are demonstrated.The authors' point of emphasis -domestic dimension, international affairs, or regional actorsdetermines the differences in the stories they tell.The study is primarily concerned with the effects that the War has had on historical writing and secondly with how this writing has affected the memory of the conflict. RsumCette thse rapporte la manire dont le dbut de la Guerre Civile Libanaise (1975-1990), un conflit graves dgts dvastateurs, est interprt dans les ouvrages acadmiques.La longue historiographie libanaise sur le conflit est truffe de contradictions diverses qui sont clairement en dsaccord sur tout ce qui concerne la cause et l'origine de la guerre civile.Dans cet essai, quatre rcits motifs diffrents seront introduits et dissqus pour rvler en fin de compte les partialits et les limites de ces travaux scolaires.Dans chaque chapitre, un rcit et ses mthodes d'encadrement seront labors.L'objet d'tude mis en relief par les auteurs, comme par exemple la dimension interne, les dveloppements rgionaux, ou la situation internationale, marque les diffrences entre les rcits.L'tude s'intresse notamment aux effets de la guerre sur l'criture historique et, en second lieu, la manire dont cette criture a affect la mmoire du conflit.This thesis would not have been possible without the continued support of my supervisor, Professor Malek Abisaab.His advice and comments were invaluable as a result of his extensive experience in writing, researching, and thinking.His encouragement and care is as relentless
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it