Le portrait de l’investissement responsable au Quebec - Resultats de recherche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La composante du capital de développement regroupe les institutions de capital de risque avec multi-objectifs (Economically Targeted Investment). Les catégories les plus importantes sont composées des actifs provenant des fonds de travailleurs et de Capital régional et coopératif Desjardins. Au total, le capital de développement mobilise des actifs de plus de 3,9 milliards de dollars (G$) en investissement à impact économique québécois, bien que nos enquêtes aient permis de catégoriser des actifs atteignant près de 1,5 G$ en 2006 (année de l’enquête pour cette composante; voir explication au chapitre 3).\nLa finance solidaire désigne le financement du développement économique communautaire et des entreprises d’économie sociale. Cette composante de la FSR canalisait des actifs de près de 330 millions $ (M$) en 2004 (année de l’enquête pour cette composante). Ces actifs sont principalement canalisés par le financement des entreprises d’économie sociale et dans le logement communautaire et social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".